This Blog Has Moved
This blog has moved to http://www.erisafile.com/blog.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- January 2010
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Categories
- 401(k)
- 403(b)
- 457 Plans
- amendments
- Automatic Enrollment
- Cafeteria Plans
- Carnival of Employee Benefits
- Cash Balance
- Compensation
- DBK
- Deduction Limits 404
- Defined Benefit
- Determination Letters
- Direct Deposit to IRA
- Distributions
- DOL
- Domestic Relations Order
- Eligibility
- ERISA
- ESOP
- Fees and Expenses
- Final 409A Regs
- Final 415 Regs
- Form 5500
- fun
- Independent Contractors
- Industry News
- Investments
- IRS
- Legislation
- Litigation
- multiemployer
- Multiple Employer Plans
- Nonqualified Deferred Comp
- Nonspouse Beneficiary
- Notices
- Phased Retirement
- Plan Language
- Profit sharing
- Quarterly Benefit Statements 508
- Regulations
- Restatements
- Rollovers
- Stock Diversification
- Termination
- Uncategorized
- Vesting
Meta
Category Archives: Litigation
Married for One Year Language Defeats Claim for Benefits
Common language contained somewhere in most qualified plan documents is the definition of spouse. Within that definition can be the requirement that a participant must be married for a period of one year before the spouse is recognized by the … Continue reading
Posted in Defined Benefit, Litigation, Plan Language
Leave a comment
7th Circuit’s Decision on COLAs in Defined Benefit Case Will Not Be Reviewed by High Court
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied Rohm & Haas’ petition for writ of certiorari. On theOrder List for March 17th, the Court stated: “07-906 ROHM AND HAAS PENSION V. WILLIAMS, GARY The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United … Continue reading
Posted in Defined Benefit, Litigation
2 Comments
Fifth Circuit: AD&D Plans Exist, Therefore They Are…ERISA
To be ERISA-qualified, a plan must: (1) exist; 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Per Curium, Read v. Sun Life Assurance, No. 07-10945, March 7, 2008. In an interesting opinion from the 5th Circuit in Read v. Sun Life Assur. Co. … Continue reading
Posted in Cafeteria Plans, Litigation
Leave a comment
Another Possible ERISA Case for the U.S. Supreme Court
In a year of great upheaval in plan documents due to regulatory and legislative changes, the third branch of government has decided to join in and add to the ERISA stress factor. This year, the U.S. Supreme Court has already … Continue reading
Posted in Cafeteria Plans, Litigation
Leave a comment
U.S. Supreme Delivers Decision in LaRue on Recovery for Fiduciary Breaches
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a decision in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Assoc. Inc., No. 06-856 (Feb. 20, 2008). (Hat tip to SCOTUSblog.) Numerous articles will be written in the next couple of days and months about the … Continue reading
Posted in 401(k), Litigation
1 Comment
Compelling Decision From Court in CIGNA Cash Balance Class Action Case
Difficult, time-consuming, and expensive litigation with uncertain results – such as this case represents – is assuredly not a sensible way to manage the Nation’s retirement system for either employers or employees. – Judge Mark R. Kravitz U.S. District Judge, … Continue reading
Posted in Cash Balance, Litigation
1 Comment
Supreme Court May Hear San Francisco ERISA Healthcare Case
SCOTUSblog is reporting that Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy has asked the city of San Francisco to respond to a plea by the Golden Gate Restaurant Association in their application that San Francisco’s Health Care Security Ordinance is pre-empted … Continue reading
Posted in Cafeteria Plans, Industry News, Litigation
Leave a comment
April 23rd is MetLife Day at U.S. Supreme Court
The oral argument calendar for April has been released by the U.S. Supreme Court, and MetLife v. Glenn is scheduled for April 23rd, 2008. It is one of two cases scheduled for that day – the other case is Meacham … Continue reading
Posted in Cafeteria Plans, Litigation
1 Comment
An Actuarial Miscalculation, an Inadequate ERISA Pleading, and a Claim Made Outside the Contractual Time Frame
Three attorneys walk into a bar after a long day at the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. One is an ERISA attorney, one is a trial attorney, and one is a mergers & acquisition attorney. The bartender takes one look … Continue reading
Posted in Litigation
1 Comment
Petition for Cert. Filed with Supreme Court in another Walmart Reimbursement Case
Roy F. Harmon III of the Health Plan Law blog is reporting that a Petition for Certiorari has been filed in Administrative Committee of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Shank, and has a copy of the petition for cert. posted on … Continue reading
Posted in Cafeteria Plans, Litigation
Leave a comment
