If a condition is grave enough to warrant disability in 1994, why isn’t it sufficient to warrant disability in 2006? The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals addressed this question in Jenkins v. Price Waterhouse Long Term Disability Plan, No. 06 C 603 (May 4, 2009).
In 1994, Charles Jenkins started receiving long-term disability benefits under [...]
Entries Tagged as 'Litigation'
Disabled by AIDS in 1994 Does Not Mean Still Disabled in 2006 According to 7th Circuit
May 6th, 2009 · No Comments
Tags: Cafeteria Plans · Litigation
8th Circuit Decides Signed Letter to Participants Plus SPD Equals Amendment
April 22nd, 2009 · No Comments
In Halbach v. Great-West Life & Annuity, No. 07-3865/07-3867 (CA8 April 13, 2009), the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed what constitutes a valid amendment to an employee welfare benefit plan. In 2004, Great-West provided a package of medical coverage to both active employees and former employees who were also receiving long-term disability [...]
Tags: Litigation · Vesting · amendments
Termination Premiums are not Pre-Petition Claims Dischargeable in Bankruptcy
April 8th, 2009 · No Comments
In PBGC v. Oneida, No. 08-2964-bk (CA 2nd, April 8, 2009), the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit reversed the decision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The 2nd Circuit found that payments due to the PBGC as a result of an employer’s termination of a pension [...]
Tags: Defined Benefit · Litigation · Termination
And The Lilly Ledbetter Litigation Begins
February 11th, 2009 · No Comments
It took just 8 days for the ERISA-related litigation over the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 to begin. When President Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Act into law on January 29, 2009, it was heralded among the non-ERISA community as creating a new world of equal pay for equal work. Among [...]
Tags: Cash Balance · Legislation · Litigation
Supreme Court to Divorced Participants – Check Beneficiary Designations if No Valid QDRO
January 27th, 2009 · 1 Comment
“ERISA provides no exception to the plan administrator’s duty to act in accordance with plan documents.”
- Headnote 2, Kennedy v. Plan Administrators for Dupont Savings.
In the game of QDRO beneficiary tug-of-war between an ex-wife and daughter over a deceased participant’s account balance, the U.S. Supreme Court today found in favor of the ex-wife in Kennedy [...]
Tags: Domestic Relations Order · Litigation
9th Circuit Decides QJSA Tug of War in Favor of Spouse at Time of Retirement
September 18th, 2008 · 3 Comments
“This case requires us to once again navigate the complex statutory scheme set out in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974….”
- Judge Clifton, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Yesterday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decided whether or not a participant in a plan with a Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity (QJSA) may change [...]
Tags: Distributions · Domestic Relations Order · ERISA · Litigation
Cashed Out Participant is Still a Participant for Breach of Fiduciary Lawsuits
July 21st, 2008 · No Comments
When is comes to litigating over alleged fiduciary breaches, when is a terminated employee no longer a participant. If you think the answer should be as soon as the terminated employee receives a lump sum distribution of their entire account balance, you would be incorrect according to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. [...]
Tags: Investments · Litigation
State of Florida to Buy US Sugar While US Sugar ESOP Litigation Continues
June 24th, 2008 · No Comments
In a fascinating and completely unexpected twist to the U.S. Sugar ESOP class action lawsuit, the governor of Florida today announced that the State of Florida will buy U.S. Sugar for $1.75 billion. With the purchase, Florida will gain control over 187,000 acres of farmland in the northern Everglades while leasing the land back [...]
Tags: ESOP · Litigation
Supreme Court Rules Against MetLife in Gordian Knot of a Decision
June 20th, 2008 · No Comments
Often the entity that administers the plan, such as an employer or an insurance company, both determines whether an employee is eligible for benefits and pays benefits out of its own pocket. We here decide that this dual role creates a conflict of interest; that a reviewing court should consider that conflict as a factor [...]
Tags: Cafeteria Plans · Litigation
Memoranda Includes Draft Opinion Letter When Disclosure Required for Tax Shelter Relief
June 3rd, 2008 · No Comments
When the IRS issued Announcement 2002-2, the Service made a tantalizing offer to taxpayers with possible tax shelter issues. In exchange for disclosure, the IRS offered to waive the accuracy penalty and underpayment of tax related to tax shelters. Announcement 2002-2 contains a list of 7 items under the title of “Information Required [...]
Tags: IRS · Litigation






